Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
by Ryan McMaken
Remember that time Ron Paul used the Golden Rule to explain his foreign policy? Conservatives booed him for that. So who can be surprised that conservatives have been falling all over themselves to condemn Ron Paul for quoting Jesus – in correct context, by the way – to note that the violence wrought by over a decade of nonstop war in America leads to tragedy on the home front?
Every neocon pundit and middle-American red-blooded conservative took a few minutes out from running around shrieking "boo-yah" and polishing his dually F-250 to be outraged that someone dared suggest that a government employee wasn't a holy relic.
The Daily Caller was the first to the show, posting Paul's twitter post without comment and allowing the comment box to quickly fill with outraged Republicans who were dismayed that anyone would not endorse every action of every single taxpayer-funded soldier who ever drew a bead on some dirt-poor 12-year-old child-soldier 10,000 miles away. Others soon piled on.
The most transparent were the conservatives who claimed to be former supporters of Paul who must now go support some more "patriotic" politician: One who doesn't actually question anything the military does.
One member at RonPaulForums.com said "'Live by the sword, die by the sword' is what the dumbest, stupidest, most delusional people around here would say. There's no way that Ron actually said this. Ugh. How said [sic] and pathetic."
That seems to be the general reaction one gets from conservatives about the Golden Rule also.
This is what it comes down to for most conservatives, of course. All that stuff about laissez faire and freedom and free markets has never been more than an act and an affectation which goes right out the window if someone ever criticizes the US Government in a truly trenchant or penetrating manner.
Most of these sunshine patriots who now whine that Ron Paul has lost their support, wouldn't ever have supported Ron Paul in the first place if Obama weren't in office. Had Ron Paul run against a GOP incumbent, most of these timid and prevaricating "opponents" of big government would have condemned Paul for questioning the glorious deeds of "our" Commander-in-Chief. Among conservatives, Ron Paul has only ever had minority support, for in the end, conservatives love government, as exhibited by their latest outrage. They just love it in a slightly different way from the left liberals.
As I've noted before, the Tea Party movement, and most conservatives who pretend to be for small government, only act when there's a Democrat in office. During eight years of Bush shredding the constitution, spending money like there was no tomorrow, and inflating the money supply with his pals at the central bank, no conservative would walk ten feet to protest the federal government. But about five minutes after Obama was sworn in, the Tea Party protests swelled into a huge disingenuous show that will evaporate five minutes after any Republican is sworn into office, assuming the GOP can actually win a national election with one of the out-of-touch never-had-a-real-job rich boys they insist on nominating.
In the end of course, Ron Paul has never been about rallying people to himself. He has been about the message, and the message is about freedom. It is a logical impossibility to be simultaneously pro-freedom and pro-military. Patrick Henry, who called government soldiers "engines of despotism" knew this. Thomas Jefferson knew this. Every true friend of liberty from William Graham Sumner to Murray Rothbard knew this. And Ron Paul knows it. Some of his supporters, still stuck in the mindset of a form of Geezer Conservatism in which "freedom-lovers" bow and scrape before the US Government, denied that Ron Paul could have even agreed with the Twitter post. No such luck for them. The tradition of laissez faire is a tradition against standing armies, and wars, and deference to military "heroics." Conservatives who are troubled by this should probably be honest with themselves and find a candidate more suitable to their views. I hear Newt Gingrich is still taking donations.
February 6, 2013
Copyright © 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
by Ryan McMaken
Remember that time Ron Paul used the Golden Rule to explain his foreign policy? Conservatives booed him for that. So who can be surprised that conservatives have been falling all over themselves to condemn Ron Paul for quoting Jesus – in correct context, by the way – to note that the violence wrought by over a decade of nonstop war in America leads to tragedy on the home front?
Every neocon pundit and middle-American red-blooded conservative took a few minutes out from running around shrieking "boo-yah" and polishing his dually F-250 to be outraged that someone dared suggest that a government employee wasn't a holy relic.
The Daily Caller was the first to the show, posting Paul's twitter post without comment and allowing the comment box to quickly fill with outraged Republicans who were dismayed that anyone would not endorse every action of every single taxpayer-funded soldier who ever drew a bead on some dirt-poor 12-year-old child-soldier 10,000 miles away. Others soon piled on.
The most transparent were the conservatives who claimed to be former supporters of Paul who must now go support some more "patriotic" politician: One who doesn't actually question anything the military does.
One member at RonPaulForums.com said "'Live by the sword, die by the sword' is what the dumbest, stupidest, most delusional people around here would say. There's no way that Ron actually said this. Ugh. How said [sic] and pathetic."
That seems to be the general reaction one gets from conservatives about the Golden Rule also.
This is what it comes down to for most conservatives, of course. All that stuff about laissez faire and freedom and free markets has never been more than an act and an affectation which goes right out the window if someone ever criticizes the US Government in a truly trenchant or penetrating manner.
Most of these sunshine patriots who now whine that Ron Paul has lost their support, wouldn't ever have supported Ron Paul in the first place if Obama weren't in office. Had Ron Paul run against a GOP incumbent, most of these timid and prevaricating "opponents" of big government would have condemned Paul for questioning the glorious deeds of "our" Commander-in-Chief. Among conservatives, Ron Paul has only ever had minority support, for in the end, conservatives love government, as exhibited by their latest outrage. They just love it in a slightly different way from the left liberals.
As I've noted before, the Tea Party movement, and most conservatives who pretend to be for small government, only act when there's a Democrat in office. During eight years of Bush shredding the constitution, spending money like there was no tomorrow, and inflating the money supply with his pals at the central bank, no conservative would walk ten feet to protest the federal government. But about five minutes after Obama was sworn in, the Tea Party protests swelled into a huge disingenuous show that will evaporate five minutes after any Republican is sworn into office, assuming the GOP can actually win a national election with one of the out-of-touch never-had-a-real-job rich boys they insist on nominating.
In the end of course, Ron Paul has never been about rallying people to himself. He has been about the message, and the message is about freedom. It is a logical impossibility to be simultaneously pro-freedom and pro-military. Patrick Henry, who called government soldiers "engines of despotism" knew this. Thomas Jefferson knew this. Every true friend of liberty from William Graham Sumner to Murray Rothbard knew this. And Ron Paul knows it. Some of his supporters, still stuck in the mindset of a form of Geezer Conservatism in which "freedom-lovers" bow and scrape before the US Government, denied that Ron Paul could have even agreed with the Twitter post. No such luck for them. The tradition of laissez faire is a tradition against standing armies, and wars, and deference to military "heroics." Conservatives who are troubled by this should probably be honest with themselves and find a candidate more suitable to their views. I hear Newt Gingrich is still taking donations.
February 6, 2013
Copyright © 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Ron Paul @RonPaul
Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense
His tweet that got Glen Beck and every other war lover upset.
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Lol at liberals using Jesus quotes to diss any patriotic related crime.
Forum Gawd- Boss
- Number of posts : 4842
Registration date : 2009-09-16
Age : 30
Location : Athol Street Nd Hemlock.!!!
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
the fuck you tAlkin bout? What liberal did that here?Joseph Smith wrote:Lol at liberals using Jesus quotes to diss any patriotic related crime.
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Freedom Propagandist wrote:the fuck you tAlkin bout? What liberal did that here?Joseph Smith wrote:Lol at liberals using Jesus quotes to diss any patriotic related crime.
Im talkin bout Ron Paul you douche!
Forum Gawd- Boss
- Number of posts : 4842
Registration date : 2009-09-16
Age : 30
Location : Athol Street Nd Hemlock.!!!
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Ron Paul is a classical liberal, not a modern day liberal and what's wrong with him quoting Jesus if its in the right context?Joseph Smith wrote:Freedom Propagandist wrote:the fuck you tAlkin bout? What liberal did that here?Joseph Smith wrote:Lol at liberals using Jesus quotes to diss any patriotic related crime.
Im talkin bout Ron Paul you douche!
Re: Ron Paul Quotes Jesus, Conservatives Outraged
Freedom Propagandist wrote:Ron Paul is a classical liberal, not a modern day liberal and what's wrong with him quoting Jesus if its in the right context?Joseph Smith wrote:Freedom Propagandist wrote:the fuck you tAlkin bout? What liberal did that here?Joseph Smith wrote:Lol at liberals using Jesus quotes to diss any patriotic related crime.
Im talkin bout Ron Paul you douche!
Im not saying its wrong, it's funny. Like me seeing a statist show fear, and using a quote to support them in a facetious manner.
Fear is the foundation of most governments; but it is so sordid and brutal a passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so stupid and miserable, that Americans will not be likely to approve of any political institution which is founded on it.
^^^ such as me using that quote.
Forum Gawd- Boss
- Number of posts : 4842
Registration date : 2009-09-16
Age : 30
Location : Athol Street Nd Hemlock.!!!
Similar topics
» So you say Conservatives/Republicans and Liberatian anarchists are the same?
» Ron Paul Farewell Speech
» Did Al Sharpton compare Obama to Jesus?
» Rand Paul fights NDAA
» paul pierce a blood?
» Ron Paul Farewell Speech
» Did Al Sharpton compare Obama to Jesus?
» Rand Paul fights NDAA
» paul pierce a blood?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:51 am by socalifascolonias
» Inland Empire Gang List
Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:12 am by kamikazi1
» Perris Street Gangs
Thu Jul 25, 2024 12:45 pm by Blakkkk
» SOUTHSIDE COLTON LA PALOMA PARK LOKOS Ost GANG
Mon Apr 08, 2024 9:42 pm by Esemuggzy
» MCP13 WHO ARE THEY?
Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:09 pm by villejuggin
» Gangs that have died out
Mon Jan 15, 2024 11:59 am by Morrolooooks
» Fontana pt2
Sun Jan 14, 2024 11:59 am by Morrolooooks
» Inactive Fontana gangs
Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:43 pm by Morrolooooks
» IE gangs in the 90s
Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:58 am by 627.loka