Most Active City in the IE

Who do you think are the most active cities in the IE in a list from 1-20 I know San Bernadino is number 1 for sure what city follows Verdugo

It depends on how one would define "active". Some cities could hold more gang members, robberies, burglaries, etc. than other cities...but does that make those cities more active then the cities that have higher murder rates?

As far as gangbanging and murder rate goes...some people may refer to the city as "Verdugo"...to me it's just San Bernardino.

Paid_In_Full wrote:It depends on how one would define "active". Some cities could hold more gang members, robberies, burglaries, etc. than other cities...but does that make those cities more active then the cities that have higher murder rates?

As far as gangbanging and murder rate goes...some people may refer to the city as "Verdugo"...to me it's just San Bernardino.

Active as in number of gangmembers per square mile

Paid_In_Full wrote:It depends on how one would define "active". Some cities could hold more gang members, robberies, burglaries, etc. than other cities...but does that make those cities more active then the cities that have higher murder rates?

As far as gangbanging and murder rate goes...some people may refer to the city as "Verdugo"...to me it's just San Bernardino.

Well to me its Verdugo!!! so take that.

San Bernardino by far obviously. But after that? I can't really tell you that, it would just be pure opinion. But I will go ahead and say Rialto after San Bernardino but way after. SB is a city in a different level of activity in IE.

surcalmex wrote:

Paid_In_Full wrote:It depends on how one would define "active". Some cities could hold more gang members, robberies, burglaries, etc. than other cities...but does that make those cities more active then the cities that have higher murder rates?

As far as gangbanging and murder rate goes...some people may refer to the city as "Verdugo"...to me it's just San Bernardino.

Active as in number of gangmembers per square mile

It's SB very easily, just look at the maps.

redlands by far....followed by rancho

San Bernardino is by far the most active city in the I.E. It ranked in the top 3 most violent cities in California for a fifth straight year in 2008 after (Compton and Oakland).

Second has to be Rialto just look at thier Police Department the worst in the I.E. that would explain why it is in second to me, it is a small city but very active and ghetto.

Third has to be Riverside, due to the amount of gangs in the city,numbers and crime rate.

I would say overall Riverside could not be suggested as such, unless your talking about specific areas of the city, the city as a whole is nowhere near being active, it's only a few pockets. Rubidoux takes the most active spot in my opinion and by far.

YEAH RIVA HAS THE SAME CRIME RATE AS ONTERIO WITH 100,000 MORE PEOPLE N ALOT MORE GANGS THAN ONTA BUT STILL VERY SIMILAR.

SB
followed by Rialto and Rubidoux.

After that I don't know.

Yeah cause Fontana, Ontario, Bloomington, Riverside, Glen Avon and Mira Loma these cities are at the same level and would problably follow San Bernadino, Rialto and Rubidoux and Colton

surcalmex wrote:Yeah cause Fontana, Ontario, Bloomington, Riverside, Glen Avon and Mira Loma these cities are at the same level and would problably follow San Bernadino, Rialto and Rubidoux and Colton

mira loma glen avon aint on the same level as fontana and riverside

~dont trip~ wrote:

surcalmex wrote:Yeah cause Fontana, Ontario, Bloomington, Riverside, Glen Avon and Mira Loma these cities are at the same level and would problably follow San Bernadino, Rialto and Rubidoux and Colton

mira loma glen avon aint on the same level as fontana and riverside

well they are small cities but they problably would if they where as big as Fonta who knows

If you go to the county registers of Riverside or San Bernardino you will find out what areas had homicides robberys assaults with deadly weapon etc for sections or cities of the county Mira Loma and Glen Avon had more murders and assaults than Fontana in 2008.

Fontana aint up there.....atleast not anymore.

Years ago, Id say it was equal with Rialto..Maybe even worse at some times and in certain spots. the city has been cleaned up..mostly everyone is locked up. the city does have lots of gang rivalries though but the numbers of each gang are too low to really put a huge dent in the crime. Not to mention like 7 plus gangs mostly operate in unicorporated Fontana.

ajax wrote:If you go to the county registers of Riverside or San Bernardino you will find out what areas had homicides robberys assaults with deadly weapon etc for sections or cities of the county Mira Loma and Glen Avon had more murders and assaults than Fontana in 2008.

Mira Loma and Glen Avon are far smaller as well, that doesn't mean much. Smaller areas will explode with increase because of that size it does not mean the those place have more activity. Mira Loma and Glen Avon have nowhere near the amount of gang activity that Fontana has.

Now that I think about it Fontana has alot of unincorporated areas that are not count in the actual population of the city but people still call it Fontana

When you say most active are you asking who is most visible, most violent, out there getting money or what?

Yeah I wouldn't say Riverside is up there! Really, there are only to active spot are the Eastside and CB. Hillside and Arlanza have been pretty quiet...

all eyes on me wrote:Yeah I wouldn't say Riverside is up there! Really, there are only to active spot are the Eastside and CB. Hillside and Arlanza have been pretty quiet...

Rubidoux has probably been the most active in terms of gun play I would say in the years that I have been here, I mainly heard of that kind of stuff over in that area. I can't speak on the Eastside, I'm sure especially from what I've heard that in the 80's and 90's the Eastside had lots of activity. I haven't been here long enough to comment on how things were over there.

But yeah overall I definatley would not place Riverside as a whole in the same levels of other cities.

man id say moreno valley is after san bernardino easy they had 4 murders in 2 months 2 murders in 1 week in 2008

Moreno Valley aint grimey in my opinion, in any way. I've always just looked at it like an outpost city for everyone to go to, and of course you got the knuckleheads out there causing problems.

Crime wise, Moreno Valley isn't such a good place. new cheaper housing out in the desert and people moving in mixing up and causing problems. I don't think its right after SB though. I think Rialto is worse.

Mo Val was where the ho's was in the 90's...