Fontana vs moreno valley

LOL maybe not tourists, but cities do like to sweep alot under the rug because they don't want people to be afraid to bring their bussinesses there, live there, and shop there.

SURCALMEX wrote:

Jinky wrote:I just came across the site while reading this topic so posted if for the hell of it

Thats cool Hey Jinky are the crime statistics actualized in Scotland? or do they cover up a lot of the shit that happens like over here too?

Its widely knowin that half of the stabbings and slashingz in the city go ureported.

Huero wrote:

SURCALMEX wrote:City governments always never report alot of shit that happens in their city as long as it doesn't hit the media they won't report it cities are afraid that this will keep tourist out and this ends up with cities loosing money but yeah I think they do cover up alot of shit that happens

yeh because rialto and fontana have so many tourists come to visit there cities

I ment Ontario, San Bernadino and Riverside aint nothing to visit in Fontana, Rialto, and Moreno valley but what happens in neighboring cities might affect sorrounding cities too like what ever happens in Fontana might affect Ontario or what ever happens in Rialto might affect San Bernardino but verdugo is already fucked up like it is and has a really bad rep even like this

There aint no major attractions anywhere around here. Ontario is the only place I would say has some attraction now because of the Mall. Fontana don't have nothing, unless you like the speedway racing, Rialto don't have anything at all. SB has a few historical landmarks, but nothing major. Overall I wouldn't say it has much to do with tourist revenue all though it does to a certain extent. It's really about the Officials of the city and there image, along with the PD's. They need to make it seem like there doing there jobs.

NYTE RYDA wrote:There aint no major attractions anywhere around here. Ontario is the only place I would say has some attraction now because of the Mall. Fontana don't have nothing, unless you like the speedway racing, Rialto don't have anything at all. SB has a few historical landmarks, but nothing major. Overall I wouldn't say it has much to do with tourist revenue all though it does to a certain extent. It's really about the Officials of the city and there image, along with the PD's. They need to make it seem like there doing there jobs.

Yeah I never thought about that making it look like the cops are doing there job thats very true RYDA

Riverside has the Mission Inn, but who really goes there?

NYTE RYDA wrote:There aint no major attractions anywhere around here. Ontario is the only place I would say has some attraction now because of the Mall. Fontana don't have nothing, unless you like the speedway racing, Rialto don't have anything at all. SB has a few historical landmarks, but nothing major. Overall I wouldn't say it has much to do with tourist revenue all though it does to a certain extent. It's really about the Officials of the city and there image, along with the PD's. They need to make it seem like there doing there jobs.

That Fontana speedway brought in millions of dollars from what Ive read. The speedway believe it or not, was probably the best thing that happened to Fontana. I think after the speedway brought in money, it was very obvious that thats when city started to really change. Whenever the big races come to town, every hotel is packed all the way to downtown SB because those racing fans travel. This hasn't much to do with the other shit we were talking about but I'm just throwing this in.(racing fans will show up no matter what city)

Yeah that's why I mentioned it.

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

LOL.

Yall?? Whose that?

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

DONTxTRIP wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

Simon check the varrios in Fontana there like 15 of them SSF alone is problably more active than alot of the gangs in Mo Val put together and huras are all over their varrio

SURCALMEX wrote:

DONTxTRIP wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

Simon check the varrios in Fontana there like 15 of them SSF alone is problably more active than alot of the gangs in Mo Val put together and huras are all over their varrio

I doubt it.. Fontana is not a factor.

Bra, when's the last time you've been to Mo Val? there are cops all over the place, especially when you get over by edgemont...

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

SURCALMEX wrote:

DONTxTRIP wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

Simon check the varrios in Fontana there like 15 of them SSF alone is problably more active than alot of the gangs in Mo Val put together and huras are all over their varrio

I doubt it.. Fontana is not a factor.

now your just makin yourself look like a fontana hater. if anything mo val aint a factor. but i guess that depends whats your factoring it in to.

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

SURCALMEX wrote:

DONTxTRIP wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

Simon check the varrios in Fontana there like 15 of them SSF alone is problably more active than alot of the gangs in Mo Val put together and huras are all over their varrio

I doubt it.. Fontana is not a factor.

LOL FONTA WAS A FACTOR BACK IN THE 70s WHEN MOVAL WAS JUST DIRT N A DREAM...AND SAME GOES FOR THE AREA NOW...MOVALs GANGS ARE GETTING MORE N MORE ACTIVE THERES NO DOUBT BUT FONTA HAS ALWAYS BEEN ACTIVE.

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

SURCALMEX wrote:

DONTxTRIP wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

sfie909 wrote:

PAPER'D_UP wrote:

NYTE RYDA wrote:Moreno Valley and Fontana are incomparable. For one Moreno Valley is a city that sprung up alot in the past 20 years. Fontana is an old city, with alot more history. Secondly Moval is mainly an outpost city, while Fontana has some established varrios.

As for Rialto, it's going to be more active than Fontana obviously.

NTYE RYDA.. just stop speaking on mo Val.. We get more money and hustlers than ya'll

i know hes not talkin about fontana becuase we got way more drug dealer s and make way more money over here.......

LOl.. It ain't no guop movin in Fontucky homie we know that

lol you just talki bout black gangs uh?....mmmoooooovvvviiiinnnnn------>

Simon check the varrios in Fontana there like 15 of them SSF alone is problably more active than alot of the gangs in Mo Val put together and huras are all over their varrio

I doubt it.. Fontana is not a factor.

da fuk u mean FONTA is not a factor?

This is the way I see it...Fontana has it's well known and established varrios that goes way back. Just about EVERYBODY throughout the Inland Empire knows about the gangs of Fontana. Although Moreno Valley is newer, it's a place that shouldn't be slept on. The crime rate and murders are higher than Fontana and other parts of the IE, even though many of it's gangs are considered "new".

FONTAxIE wrote:yea thats what i was sayng.....what do u guys think about fontana vs rialto

....FONTANA'S WAY MORE ACTIVE THAN RIALTO....

that depends on what u lookin at, as far as hispanic gangs go i'd say Fontana with gangs like CGS, TFK, THL, LK's and others doin they things and causin havac. Where as in Rialto it's really only Sage St. doin any real damage but keep in mind Sage is prolly the most active of all hispanic gangs in the area as of late. Just bein real. And if u talkin about blacc gangs obviously Rialto is more active hands down. There's only 2 blacc gangs in Fontana that u could consider really active 1 I wouldn't really say is that active. Other then that there's really no blacc activity in Fontana. So it depends on ones opinion and what demographics ur lookin at.

Also based on crime statistics Rialto has the edge but like I said it's based on ones opinion, im sure there's a lot of spots in Fontana people would consider hella grimey. Same goes 4 Rialto, I kno my blocc is a spot u wouldn't wanna be caught on if u dnt got business over there, and so is the vineyards, Sage's hood, and the 5's if u consider that Rialto which I do. It's all based on opinion.

I agree with dstrm300. I consider Rialto to be a little more active, and a little more kaotic. Fontana has activity when it comes to the chicano gangs, but at the same time Rialto has alot too. although I do recognize alot of gang activity in Fontana is in unincorporated land.