Avid Gun Supporter And Gun Show YouTube Sensation Found Murdered In His Home

Keith Ratliff, manager of the extremely popular YouTube channel "FPS Russia", was found dead in his home last Thursday, the victim of an apparent execution style gun-shot wound to the back of the head.

The Channel has over half a billion views and several million subscribers which makes it one of the most viewed things in the world. Basically, FPS Russia features a highly trained Russian guy shooting a variety of weaponry under controlled environments in a several acre private Ranch in Georgia.







The videos show some of the most extreme examples of shooting, probably why the channel is so popular.

Ratliff was the producer behind the channel and was a staunch gun-supporter, a sentiment which grew in him even more after the recent mass shootings . According to official reports, he was found dead, tied to a chair, in his home with a single gun-shot wound to the back of the head. No evidence of an apparent struggle was found, and surrounding Keith were several of his own weapons. Relatives of Keith are baffled as to why he didn't use any of those weapons in self-defense.

Here's a tweet he made late last year illustrating that point - he strongly believed in legally carrying concealed guns for self-defense:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Doug Hagman, head of the northeast intelligence network and insider of the department of Homeland Security, stated just last week that the government will begin purging top gun personalities at will. More than 3 popular television series revolving around guns have been cancelled in the past month, and gun owners across the nation are beginning to experience persecution and demonetization on unprecedented levels.

Ratliffs death is one of a handful of mysterious cases since the beginning of the new year. Also, Alex Jones was publicly threatened in a "debate" last night on CNN.




Folks, it's getting real out there.

So is this there excuse of an example that guns wont help you even through self defense? Shit is ridiculous, I cant believe dumb ass people believe this crap. Good find.

Also I think this belongs in the conspiracy section.

Hmm, posted it in here by accident. Moved.

I fear for the Russian dude's life now. Someone got to Ratliff, and he was just the producer, though he did, on occasion, participate in the videos. Gun owners are targets, especially high profile ones. I expect stories like this to become very frequent this year.

Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

There agenda will be accomplished and it is inevitable, but why get your stuff registered when you already understand the true nature of our so called "superiors". I never really looked in to those Alex Jones rants, but with what just happened with Piers Morgan I only look at him as a puppet that they use to strengthen their agendas by making those opposed to the control the gubbament has against us look like anti-social hicks.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that. This is just another pathetic excuse for them to have more control over things. Those that Pro-Gun Control will only help make it harder to own a gun, and that will not make a difference since getting one on the street is not a difficult task. Since our eyes have been opened with the reality of the true nature those governing the soil we call home have to advise others the difference between propaganda and a sincere movement wanting better safety for us average joes.

These types of massacres that have been going on with random white neighborhoods, schools, and theaters have been going on in our backyards since the 70s. Random drive bys with stray bullets killing innocent children have been going on for four decades, and now they decided to enforce stricter firearm regulations? Why not back then? What ever is in their agenda is nothing that will support what ever these left wing sheeple are pulling for.

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

Disarming hispanic communities? In what way? Every time a gang loses one gun they get two more lol?

Martial Law will be declared in this decade.. I can see it happening..

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

Disarming hispanic communities? In what way? Every time a gang loses one gun they get two more lol?

Martial Law will be declared in this decade.. I can see it happening..

I'm talking about legally disarming. You can't just buy a handgun and walk around town with it, legally. Unless you can get a CCW permit, which isn't easy.

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

Disarming hispanic communities? In what way? Every time a gang loses one gun they get two more lol?

Martial Law will be declared in this decade.. I can see it happening..

I'm talking about legally disarming. You can't just buy a handgun and walk around town with it, legally. Unless you can a CCW permit, which isn't easy.

Whats the point of getting your shit registered? So the fascist scum bags we have taxing us can know who and who has what? So they can gut me up like that one dude that just got merked? No thanks! I'd rather just scratch off that serial number and have my untraceable fun all day everyday!

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

Disarming hispanic communities? In what way? Every time a gang loses one gun they get two more lol?

Martial Law will be declared in this decade.. I can see it happening..

I'm talking about legally disarming. You can't just buy a handgun and walk around town with it, legally. Unless you can a CCW permit, which isn't easy.

Whats the point of getting your shit registered? So the fascist scum bags we have taxing us can know who and who has what? So they can gut me up like that one dude that just got merked? No thanks! I'd rather just scratch off that serial number and have my untraceable fun all day everyday!

I don't think we should get anything registered. I'm hardcore on this issue though. I don't even think ex-convicts should be forbidden from owning firearms.

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:

Day Ryda wrote:

DaddIE Cray Lowk wrote:Yeah. If you read the left wing forums and people that are for gun control/gun bans, you'll see them spending a lot of the time arguing that owning a firearm is stupid, because your weapon is more likely to be used against you, then in defense of you. This story will only help solidify their point, just like Alex Jones yelling and ranting on CNN towards Piers Morgan solidified their point that gun owners are angry white rednecks and are nuts.

Of course, the argument fails. Because for one thing, the main benefit of being armed is the deterrent factor. You can count the amount of people that used their weapon in self defense directly, and you can count the amount of people that had their own weapon used against them, but you can really calculate the amount of incidences where firearm ownership caused a deterrence.

I doubt that stricter gun laws will really make a difference, and all of us know that here on this forum, and I am pretty sure the "Superiors" know that.

They know it will lead to average joe law abiding citizen following the gun control laws, and people that live in bad neighborhoods will continue to own firearms for protection regardless of the law, which will wind up putting more blacks and hispanics in prison for non-violent crimes such as owning an object that the government forbids. They have somewhat succeeded in disarming minority populations more so than white suburban population. These mass shootings are the way in which they will justify disarming the white communities also.

Disarming hispanic communities? In what way? Every time a gang loses one gun they get two more lol?

Martial Law will be declared in this decade.. I can see it happening..

I'm talking about legally disarming. You can't just buy a handgun and walk around town with it, legally. Unless you can a CCW permit, which isn't easy.

Whats the point of getting your shit registered? So the fascist scum bags we have taxing us can know who and who has what? So they can gut me up like that one dude that just got merked? No thanks! I'd rather just scratch off that serial number and have my untraceable fun all day everyday!

I don't think we should get anything registered. I'm hardcore on this issue though. I don't even think ex-convicts should be forbidden from owning firearms.

To other left-wing pansies we are hardcore, but in reality we are just not willing follow a law that can prevent us from protecting our own homes. What the hell am I supposed to do if some asshole decides to break inside my home with a gun? I have a better chance of survival with a gun then without.